Scholarly works in Clinical Pharmacy & Administration

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://repository.ibadanedu.com/handle/123456789/383

Browse

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Pharmacists’ involvement with and pharmacy clients’ awareness of adverse drug reaction reporting in Nigeria – a mixed-methods approach.
(Oxford, 2022) Showande, J.S.; Ikuomola F.I.
Objectives Adverse drug reactions are one of the leading causes of death, yet they are under-reported. This study assessed the involvement of community pharmacists in the identification, documentation, and reporting of adverse drug reactions and pharmacy clients’ awareness of the adverse drug reaction reporting system. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-guided survey was conducted among 780 pharmacy clients in six selected community pharmacies, and seven mystery clients visited 125 community pharmacies in Ibadan, Nigeria. Information on pharmacy clients’ experience of adverse drug reactions, to whom and how they were reported, was obtained. Female and male mystery clients’ performed two scripted scenarios, complaining of black patches on their thighs and blood in their faeces, respectively. The proportion of pharmacists who identified the complaints as adverse drug reactions, documented and reported them, was described. Key findings The response rate for the pharmacy clients’ survey was 98.5%. Some pharmacy clients, 385 (50.1%), had experienced adverse drug reactions; 49 (12.7%) of these pharmacy clients were hospitalised and 73 (19.0%) of them reported the adverse drug reactions to physicians or pharmacists. Most of the pharmacy clients, 706 (91.9%), did not use the available reporting system. A total of 218 mystery client visits were made. The proportion of pharmacists who recognised the mystery client complaints as adverse drug reactions was 4.9–60.3% depending on the scenario presented and up to two pharmacists documented and supposedly reported the adverse drug reactions. Conclusions Some of the pharmacy clients reported experiencing adverse drug reactions to healthcare professionals, but most did not report through the existing reporting scheme. Community pharmacists could identify adverse drug reactions but most failed to document or report them.
The Concept of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting: Awareness among Pharmacy Students in a Nigerian University
(AKS Publications., 2007) Showande, J.S.; Fakeye, T.O
Adverse drug reaction (ADR) is poorly reported globally but more in developing countries with poor participation by health professionals. Currently, there is no known literature on the Nigerian pharmacy students’ knowledge on ADR reporting. Hence the purpose of this study was to find out the level of knowledge of pharmacy students on the concept of pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting and also to evaluate their opinions on the National Pharmacovigilance Centre guidelines on adverse drug reaction reporting. A pretested 34-item semi-structured questionnaire was administered among 69 pharmacy undergraduate students in their penultimate and final years that consented to take part in the study, in one of the universities in Nigeria. The study was carried out strictly adhering to the principles outlined in the Helsinki declaration of 1964, which was revised in 1975. The questionnaire used had four sections which included a section on biographical data, a section which evaluated the students’ knowledge on the concept of pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting, a section on students personal experiences of adverse drug reactions and modes of reporting them and the final section of the questionnaire evaluated the students’ opinions on the National Pharmacovigilance Centre guidelines for reporting adverse drug reactions. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis statistical tests were used to analyze the data obtained. None of the participants knew the sequence of reporting ADR. More than half, 40(58.0%) had heard about pharmacovigilance at symposiums, 7(10.1%) during clinical clerkship program and 18(26.1%) from media jingles. Twenty nine (42.0%) agreed that pharmacovigilance was in their curriculum, however only 16(23.2%) could define the term correctly. None of the participants had seen or used an ADR form prior to the study, but the students could easily identify and describe the type of ADR they had personally experienced in detail, however, they did not know the channel of reporting it. Only 3% reported incidences of personal experience of ADR to the physician while another 3% reported cases of such to the pharmacist. There was a significant difference comparing students’ year of study in the pharmacy program with their opinion scores on the National Pharmacovigilance Centre (NPC) guidelines on ADR reporting (p <0.05). The lack of pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting courses in the pharmacy school curriculum result in the poor knowledge of the students on the concept of adverse drug reaction reporting, nonetheless the view and knowledge they had garnered from different sources helped the students in identifying and describing ADR but this is not enough in properly documenting cases of ADRs. Thus, the poor knowledge on ADR reporting among the students requires speedy implementation of new curriculum incorporating pharmacovigilance to enhance the involvement of pharmacists in ADR reporting in Nigeria.