scholarly works

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://repository.ibadanedu.com/handle/123456789/534

Browse

Start date: 2020Subject: search.filters.subject.Spinal cord injury

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ‘We don’t have to do it together’: a qualitative study of Physiotherapists’ and patients’ perceptions about collaborative goal setting in Nigeria
    (Taylor & Francis, 2022) Olaleye, O. A.; Agoro, Z. B.
    Background: The adoption of Collaborative Goal Setting (CGS) is limited in most rehabilitation settings in Nigeria despite its recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Objective: To explore the perceptions of physiotherapists and patients about CGS at a tertiary healthcare facility in Ibadan, Nigeria. Methods: We conducted focus group discussions among purposively selected physiotherapists (n = 8) and patients (4 stroke survivors, 3 patients with brain injury) to qualitatively explore their perceptions. Audio-taped discussions were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Results: We identified four themes around CGS which were: 1) paternalistic view of goal setting; 2) physiotherapists as goal setters; 3) perceived benefits of collaborative goal setting; and 4) barriers and facilitators to CGS. The physiotherapists articulated goals as expected outcomes from treat- ment and believed they were better poised and experienced to determine what patients could achieve during each phase of treatment. Patients' view of goal setting agreed with the physio- therapists', as they also opined that goal setting is the responsibility of physiotherapists. Time constraint, inadequate knowledge and the inability of patients to appropriately articulate their goals and expectations from treatment were barriers to CGS. Concerns about who to collaborate with when dealing with patients with impaired cognition and/or disorders of consciousness were raised by the physiotherapists. Participants in both groups indicated that education on how to set patient-oriented goals could facilitate CGS. Conclusions: Though rarely practiced, participants agreed that collaborative goal setting could be beneficial. Both the physiotherapists and patients require education on how to appropriately collaborate in setting goals of rehabilitation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Expectations of Individuals with Neurological Conditions from Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Study of Needs
    (South African Society of Physiotherapy, 2021) Olaleye, O. A.; Zaki, D. A.; Hamzat, T. K.
    Background: Knowledge of the specific expectations of patients with neurological conditions (NCs) from rehabilitation helps in setting attainable goals. Such expectations may vary from situation to situation. There are no studies investigating rehabilitation expectations amongst individuals with NCs in Nigeria. Objectives: The aim of our study was to explore the rehabilitation expectations of individuals with NCs. Method: This convergent mixed-methods study comprised a cross-sectional survey of 105 individuals with NCs and two sessions of Focus Group Discussions (FGDS) amongst eight individuals with NCs. The modified Needs Assessment Questionnaire was used to assess rehabilitation needs as a proxy for rehabilitation expectations, whilst disability was assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics and analysed using inferential statistics at p < 0.05. Thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data. Results: Sixty-one (58.1%) stroke survivors, 33 (31.4%) individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and 11 (10.5%) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) aged 46.48 ± 15.91 were surveyed. The need for social/recreational activity was the most expressed need (100%) amongst the participants. Mobility was reported as an important need constituting a barrier to enjoying life by 93 (88.6%) participants. Individuals with SCI expressed the greatest needs compared with the other two groups. Needs were significantly correlated with severity of disability (p < 0.05). Four overarching themes (physical health, financial, healthcare services/rehabilitation and emotional/social) representing major areas of needs emerged from the FGD data. Conclusion: Individuals with NCs in Nigeria have specified expectations of rehabilitation. Disability was a major driver of these expectations, irrespective of NC subtype. Clinical implications: Rehabilitation programmes for individuals with NCs should target expressed needs or expectations of each patient cohort and minimise disabilities associated with these conditions.