FACULTY OF CLINICAL SCIENCES

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.ibadanedu.com/handle/123456789/265

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Kola, L.Subject: search.filters.subject.Psychosocial interventions

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effect of intervention delivered by lay maternal care providers to improve outcome and parenting skills among adolescents with perinatal depression in Nigeria (the RAPiD study): a cluster randomized controlled trial
    (Elsevier, 2022) Gureje, O.; Oladeji, B. D.; Kola, L.; Bello, T.; Ayinde, O.; Faregh, N.; Bennett, I.; Zelkowitz, P.
    Background: Perinatal depression is more common and is associated with greater negative consequences among adolescents than adults. Psychosocial interventions designed for adults may be inadequate at addressing the unique features of adolescent perinatal depression. Methods: In a two-arm parallel cluster randomized trial conducted in thirty primary maternal care clinics in Ibadan, Nigeria (15-intervention and 15-control) we compared age-appropriate intervention consisting of problem-solving therapy, behavioral activation, parenting skills training, and parenting support from a self- identified adult to care as usual. Pregnant adolescents (aged <20 years) at fetal gestational age16–36 weeks with moderate to severe depression were recruited. Primary outcomes were depression symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS) and parenting practices (Infant-Toddler version of the Home Inventory for Measurement of the Environment, HOME-IT) at six-months postnatal. Results: There were 242 participants (intervention arm: 141; Control arm: 101), with a mean age of 18∙0 (SD- 1∙2). Baseline mean EPDS score was 14∙2 (SD-2.1); 80∙1 % completed the six-month postnatal follow-up. The intervention group had lower level of depressive symptoms than the control group, mean EPDS scores: 5∙5 (SD- 3∙6) versus 7∙2 (SD-4∙0) (adjusted mean difference -1∙84 (95%CI- 3∙06 to 􀀀0∙62; p =0∙003) and better parenting practices, mean total HOME-IT scores: 29∙8 (SD-4∙4) versus 26∙4 (SD-4∙2) (adjusted mean difference 3∙4 (95%Cl- 2∙12 to 4∙69, p =0∙001). Limitations: This study explored the effect of complex interventions making it difficult to know precisely what aspects produced the outcomes. Conclusions: An age-appropriate psychosocial intervention package holds promise for scaling up care for adolescents with perinatal depression especially in resource-constrained settings.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    High versus low intensity interventions for perinatal depression delivered by non-specialist primary maternal care providers in Nigeria: a cluster randomized controlled trial: (the EXPONATE trial)
    (2019) Gureje, O.; Oladeji, B. D.; Montgomery, A. A.; Araya, R.; Bello, T.; Chisholm, D.; Groleau, D.; Kirmayer, L. J.; Kola, L.; Olley, L.; Tan, W.; Zelkowitz, P.
    Contextually appropriate interventions delivered by primary maternal care providers (PMCPs) might be effective in reducing the treatment gap for perinatal depression. Aim To compare high-intensity treatment (HIT) with low-intensity treatment (LIT) for perinatal depression. Method Cluster randomised clinical trial, conducted in Ibadan, Nigeria between 18 June 2013 and 11 December 2015 in 29 maternal care clinics allocated by computed-generated random sequence (15 HIT; 14 LIT). Interventions were delivered individually to antenatal women with DSM-IV (1994) major depression by trained PMCPs. LIT consisted of the basic psychosocial treatment specifications in the World Health Organization Mental Health Gap Action Programme – Intervention Guide. HIT comprised LIT plus eight weekly problem-solving therapy sessions with possible additional sessions determined by scores on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The primary outcome was remission of depression at 6 months postpartum (EPDS < 6). Results There were 686 participants; 452 and 234 in HIT and LIT arms, respectively, with both groups similar at baseline. Follow-up assessments, completed on 85%, showed remission rates of 0% with HIT and 66% with LIT: risk difference 4% (95% CI −4.1%, 12.0%), adjusted odds ratio 1.12 (95% CI 0.73, 1.72). HIT was more effective for severe depression (odds ratio 2.29; 95% CI 1.01, 5.20; P = 0.047) and resulted in a higher rate of exclusive breastfeeding. Infant outcomes, cost-effectiveness and adverse events were similar. Conclusions Except among severely depressed perinatal women, we found no strong evidence to recommend high-intensity in preference to low-intensity psychological intervention in routine primary maternal care.